🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to use a redrawn congressional district plan that may create several five new Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 ruling, issued on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to overturn a federal judge's block that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and upsetting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its decision.

The district court had previously found that Texas had likely classified voters according to their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the new maps. It had ordered the state to revert to the maps established after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

With a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's decision. She contended that it disregarded the work of the district court, observing that its opinion was written by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a infraction of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Struggle

This decision occurs during a national battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican control. Usually, redistricting takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that could add several additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have responded with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas attorney general praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures representation supportive of his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

On the other hand, Democratic representatives lamented the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major party election organization.

A top House figure argued the court had once again eroded its standing by approving a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he concluded.