🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective professional network test recently after popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."